Links
Course Documents
     Register
     Main Page
     The Razor's Edge
     Design Team
     STRONG Project
     STRONG Architecture
     Conceptual Model
     Graphic Organizer
     Benchmarks
     Reflections 4 STRONG
     Independent Research
     Learning with Games
     Challenges
     Course Swiki
Swiki Features:
  View this Page
  Edit this Page
  Printer Friendly View
  Lock this Page
  References to this Page
  Uploads to this Page
  History of this Page
  Top of the Swiki
  Recent Changes
  Search the Swiki
  Help Guide
Related Links:
     Atlas Program
     Center for LifeLong Learning and Design
     Computer Science Department
     Institute of Cognitive Science
     College of Architecture and Planning
     University of Colorado at Boulder
STRONG's First Progress Report

1. Statement of Problem

1.1 What is this project about?


The project is about designing modular, self-contained, easily accessible, multi-player interactive online learning environments called STRuctured-scenario ONline Games (STRONG) using the games unique features that help direct, facilitate, and assess middle-school students learning of specific domain knowledge and concepts in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). These online games use challenging scenarios to not only engage middle-school students but also provide them control over their learning environment.



2. Rationale

2.1 Why are we doing this project?


In our class, we have often talked about learning being affected by motivational AND cognitive issues. An expectation failure or cognitive dissonance initiated through discrepant events and ranking task assessments could influence learners' motivation. Using developmentally appropriate STEM concepts and standards from the Benchmarks for Science Literacy (1993), we identify, use, and embed student misconceptions in STRONG to foster a deliberate STOP –> REFLECT –> THINK –> ACT approach to rekindle players' intentionality and inherent preference for goal-oriented actions and launch them into active inquiry learning.



3. Implementation/Non-Implementation Project Components

For the STRONG project, we have decided to do both a research (non-implementation) component, as well as a technical (implementation) component. The details of the two facets of the project are discussed below.


3.1 Implementation Component


3.1.1 Technical Approach


We will be employing a few different technologies in order to make a basic version of STRONG realized. The main component will be written in Flash and students will have access to a Java applet to showcase a unique "learning" activity. In our case, we will use the electrical circuit construction Java applet designed by the Physics Education Technology Team. Our STRONG interface will also includes provisions for chat, a reflection space, and an assessment section. The details of the user interface design will be discussed later on in this paper. There will also be a backend database, using PHP and Microsoft Access technology. Different elements of Photoshop and Fireworks will also be used. Here is our current user interface for STRONG..



3.1.2 Implementation Plan


The plan for implementation is as follows:

  • Design and develop a template for the interface
  • Design a scenario that the electrical circuit construction Java simulation could be applied to. The scenario will help motivate the students by actually providing some context.
  • Design and administer a hands-on and ten question online pretest, collect real-time data in our database, and based on student performance, start an appropriate level of STRONG (beginner, intermediate, proficient, & advanced)
  • Design, animate, and present various scenarios
  • Introduce a circuit construction Java applet
  • Design and develop the interface that students will interact with, for ranking task assessments, extension questions, and collecting real-time data in our database.
  • Design and administer a hands-on posttest, ten question online posttest, and collect real-time data to compare students' performance in pre- and post-tests.


3.2 Non-Implementation Component


3.2.1 Hypotheses



The purpose of our design is to determine the relative effectiveness of using the STRONG Model and the differential effect of the two independent variables (using STRONG and inquiry-based instructin) on middle-school-students’ achievement in basic electrical circuitry.

Experimental 2 x 2 factorial design study using the STRONG Model
:
























STRONG (S) No STRONG (N)
Inquiry-based instruction (I) SI NI
Direct instruction (D) SD ND


The subjects in this study, middle school students, will be randomly assigned into four groups. In this design, all four groups will be tested using our simple online electric circuits pretest and a hands-on circuit construction. The three experimental groups ("SI," "NI," & "SD") will be exposed to the differential treatments, the treatments being a combination of teaching circuits using STRONG and inquiry-based instruction. The control group ("ND") will not be exposed to both treatments but will be taught circuits through direct instruction. Then the four groups will be evaluated using our online circuit posttest and students' performance in hands-on circuit construction.



3.2.2 How the work will investigate issues not known


STRONG will be used in classrooms and our software is suited for prototype testing, code reuse, and usability studies. We will use the same design process students use to evaluate the effectiveness of these contextualized simulations as a basis for STEM learning in middle school settings. We also plan to implement novel situations that stimulate students' imagination, increase motivation, aid memory retention, and increase cooperation using STRONG. These are ideas that could benefit from more exploration and refinement, and future end-user modifications.




4. In-Class Presentation

Here is the link to our slides shown during the in class presentation.



5. References


(1) Multimedia Learning - Richard Mayer


(2) 10 Principles on Good Design - Roger Schank


(3) Design of Everyday Things - Dan Norman


(4) The Role of Children in the Design of New Technology - Allison Druin


(5) Techtactics - Carolyn Thorsen



View this PageEdit this PagePrinter Friendly ViewLock this PageReferences to this PageUploads to this PageHistory of this PageTop of the SwikiRecent ChangesSearch the SwikiHelp Guide