Links
Course Documents
     Register
     Main Page
     Assignments
     Contact Information
     Course Announcement
     Schedule and Syllabus
     Course Participants
     Discussion Forum
     Swiki Chat
     Lecture Material
     Independent Research
     Projects
     Questionnaires
     Previous Course
Swiki Features:
  View this Page
  Edit this Page
  Printer Friendly View
  Lock this Page
  References to this Page
  Uploads to this Page
  History of this Page
  Top of the Swiki
  Recent Changes
  Search the Swiki
  Help Guide
Related Links:
     Atlas Program
     Center for LifeLong Learning and Design
     Computer Science Department
     Institute of Cognitive Science
     College of Architecture and Planning
     University of Colorado at Boulder
Nathan Balasubramanian's Response to Assignment 9

Read Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Ye, Y., Sutcliffe, A. G., & Mehandjiev, N. (2004) "Meta-Design: A Manifesto for End-User Development," Communications of the ACM, 47(9), pp. 33-37, available at http://l3d.cs.colorado.edu/~gerhard/papers/CACM-meta-design.pdf


Briefly discuss the following issues (articulate the answers in your own words) :

1.1 What did you find interesting about the article?



That tools need to motivate their users by showing them a range of possibilities that are achievable using the tool – through examples and demonstrations.


1.2. What did you find not interesting about the article?

Nothing uninteresting.

2. what do you consider the main message of the article?

The design of socio-technical environments that empower users and technologies that facilitate widespread collaboration are the key to successful end-user development.

3. Is meta-design an

3.1. interesting concept? why?

As a means of transferring ownership of the design process to the end-users and promoting abstract conceptual thinking, meta-design is undoubtedly an interesting concept.

3.2. not interesting? why?

I personally don’t know if examples and demonstrations or rewards and recognition alone might motivate end-users. Almost all computer-based tools have examples and demonstrations (even videos) to inspire the users. Motivating end-users is difficult and I know of one that indeed does with a large spectrum of people. Games seem to engage end-users through tangible goal accomplishments and several other characteristics – or what Papert might call, hard fun and challenging problems.

4. What do you consider the major technical and social challenges associated with meta-design?

4.1. technical?

Providing timely and on-demand feedback to users when they use tools seems to me the biggest challenge.

4.2. social?

Despite available and new technologies, for effective contributions and collaboration, providing adequate human contact seems to be the biggest social challenge.





5. Describe your own experience with meta-design

5.1. with ideas associated with meta-design

I am currently struggling with these issues in the design of STRONG (STRuctured-scenario ONline Games) because I recognize the need for these games to be evolving design problems. I think developing design spaces in which students might make the existing scenarios at different levels of STRONG (beginner, intermediate, proficient, and advanced) more difficult for other students is one way of tapping into their creativity, yet developing their conceptual thinking abilities.

5.2. with systems built on meta-design?

The communities that have evolved around the use of computer technologies – such as Physlets – the java applets that were initially developed as physics on-demand simulations but now extend into science education and SketchUp for conceptual 3D design are a source of inspiration. Adapting these for classroom use in K-12 settings for teaching science and engineering is the ongoing challenge for teachers.



Nathan Balasubramanian

View this PageEdit this PagePrinter Friendly ViewLock this PageReferences to this PageUploads to this PageHistory of this PageTop of the SwikiRecent ChangesSearch the SwikiHelp Guide