Collaboration Team 1
 

Main | Proposal | Progress Reports | Final Paper | Instructor Feedback | Contact us 

 

Independent Research

Established Web 2.0 Technologies Effectively Encouraging Active Collaboration

Progress Report #1 - Example of Web 2.0 technologies explored:

  • Wikipedia (http://www.wikipedia.com)

Wikipedia-

    Wikipedia is an encyclopedia in the form of a wiki.  This generally means that it is an online encylopedia that may be edited by it's users at any time.  There are some basic administrators to watch over things, with the ability to block users and protect certain articles.  They do not, however, have the ability to edit articles because this is done by Wikipedia's users.

Statistics:

English-Language Wikipedia articles: 1,674,446
Total Edits: 117,398,323
Average Edits Per Page: 14.97
Registered Users: 3,764,684

A great video showing the development of an article on Wikipedia over a time span of a couple years:

http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/gems/umlaut.html

    This video does a great job of showing how a relatively unimportant article on Wikipedia grows quite large over a couple years, and turns into a great knowledge resource.  The article is edited a couple hundred times, all by users of Wikipedia.  People constantly use the wiki's technology to correct small pieces of the content already part of the article, and also to add new content in order to make the article cover a larger area.

    Overall, Wikipedia does a great job of showing how Web 2.0 technologies (a wiki in this case) can provide a very beneficial tool.  In this case Wikipedia fosters an environment of collaboration which has an end result of providing an encyclopedia of knowledge to the world.  The fact that all of it's articles are edited by users allows Wikipedia to continue to be a free service, further increasing its popularity.

Wikipedia also talks about their common objections, such as statements that declare Wikipedia can never be high quality.  Some people have doubts about the motivation required to get individuals to participate in creating and editing articles.  Wikipedia explains that academics usually get their jobs because they like learning/teaching, and that this same sort of environment is provided.  Plus, there is the joy of contributing and creating something of quality.

Progress Report #2 - Web 2.0 technologies by example of Web 2.0 technologies explored:
Web 1.0    Web 2.0

DoubleClick --> Google AdSense
Ofoto --> Flickr
Akamai --> BitTorrent
mp3.com --> Napster
Britannica Online --> Wikipedia
personal websites --> blogging
evite --> upcoming.org and EVDB
domain name speculation --> search engine optimization
page views --> cost per click
screen scraping --> web services
publishing --> participation
content management systems --> wikis
directories (taxonomy) --> tagging ("folksonomy")
stickiness --> syndication

Source

"Web 1.0 was commerce. Web 2.0 is collaboration"

  • Digg (http://www.digg.com)
  • Upcoming.org (http://www.upcoming.org)
  • Chipin.com (http://www.chipin.com)
Digg-
Information on digg.com
Upcoming.org-

Information on upcoming.org